Stay In This World
The stories, the culture, the conversations. Every week.
No spam. No third parties. Just Unruly.
Storytelling infrastructure, craft, and the urgency of this cultural moment.
In late December 2025 and through January 2026, a 21-year-old American streamer named IShowSpeed spent 28 days traveling across 20 African countries, broadcasting live to tens of millions of followers. He ate jollof rice in Accra, celebrated his birthday in Lagos, he stood at Gorée Island in Dakar and asked his audience to sit with the history beneath his feet. Hundreds of thousands watched in real time. Millions more replayed the clips. Ghana's foreign minister called him a worthy ambassador and approved a Ghanaian passport for him.
The reaction said something important: when an outside voice arrives on the continent with genuine curiosity and a large enough platform, the world pays attention to Africa in a way it rarely manages to when its an African are doing the telling. IShowSpeed did not produce a documentary, neither did he file a report. He streamed himself reacting to food, dancing badly, and being overwhelmed by crowds. The production value was a camera and a microphone. But, the reach was historic.
This is not a criticism of IShowSpeed in any way. The tour was largely positive, and the perception shift it produced was real. It is an observation about infrastructure. A 21-year-old American with a YouTube account reached more people in 28 days than most African media institutions reach in a year. The stories are here. The audience is here. But, the apparatus to connect them at scale is not.
America's cultural dominance for the better part of a century was not an accident of talent. Rather, it was an accident of infrastructure. Hollywood was built on studio systems, distribution networks, financing structures, and government policy that protected and promoted American stories globally. CNN shaped how the world understood Africa, and other regions for decades. Not because American journalists understood the continent better than Africans did, but because CNN had the satellite, the bureau, the brand, and the distribution that African media organisations did not.
The content flowed in one direction for so long that it began to feel natural. Some of us absorbed western stories so thoroughly that we began to experience them as our own. We knew their cities, states, food, like it was ours. Marvel's universe felt universal. American coming-of-age narratives felt familiar. The default protagonist of global storytelling was, for a very long time, assumed to be American or European, and everything else was niche, regional, or exotic.
But, that assumption is cracking. Western cultural output has not stopped being good, rather it has started being repetitive. Hollywood has spent a decade mining its own archive: reboots, sequels, extended universes, franchise extensions of franchise extensions. The western fashion industry has been telling the same story about aspiration and minimalism for so long that the most interesting designers working today are the ones drawing from somewhere else entirely. The most compelling music of the last decade has come from outside the western canon. The interest has genuinely shifted, and it has largely shifted toward Africa.
Between 2023 and 2024, Korean productions consistently ranked as the second most-viewed content category on Netflix after US programming, accounting for approximately eight to nine percent of total viewing time. Korea did not wait for Hollywood to tell Korean stories. State subsidies for filmmakers and reinforced screen quotas shielded local cinema from Hollywood dominance while constructing the infrastructure for an industry capable of projecting Korean stories internationally. Japan built a gaming industry whose aesthetic influence, from character design to world-building to visual language, has shaped global creative culture across film, animation, fashion, and music in ways that rival the reach of most national film industries.. The lesson from Asia is not that talent alone is enough. It is that talent plus infrastructure plus intentionality produces cultural dominance.
Africa has the talent. It also has the stories. The infrastructure question is where the essay gets complicated.
There is a version of this argument that blames the absence of African stories on the global stage entirely on western gatekeeping: on distribution systems that were not built for African content, on financing structures that don't reach African creators, on a media ecosystem that has historically framed the continent through a foreign gaze. That version is true as far as it goes. But it is not the whole story, and an essay that stops there is doing African creative industries a disservice.
In 2009, UNESCO declared Nollywood the second-largest film industry in the world by annual volume of film productions, surpassing Hollywood and second only to Bollywood. But this characterisation was based on quantity, the number of films produced. For a country's movie industry to achieve global success, it must be successful outside its home market. In this area, Nigeria's film industry has performed poorly.
Nollywood has historically been known for its scrappy ingenuity: a high-output, low-budget machine with unstoppable creative force. It has delivered hundreds of films annually, launched multimillion-dollar franchises on microbudgets, and captivated millions, all without fully connecting to international systems.
The uncomfortable question sitting inside this is:
when African talent is passed over for international productions, is it always because of structural bias? Or is some of it because the industry has not consistently held itself to the standard that makes exclusion impossible to justify?
When a Hollywood studio adapts a story rooted in Yoruba mythology, the expectation from Nigerian audiences is that Nigerian actors, crew, costume designers, dialect coaches, and cultural consultants would be central to the production. That expectation is reasonable. But it only becomes an enforceable demand when the industry behind it has demonstrated the technical credibility that is impossible to overlook.
The UK does not worry about British actors being sidelined in Harry Potter productions. The franchise cast almost exclusively from British and Irish talent as a matter of both cultural practice and deliberate production policy. Since 1962, every actor to play James Bond in the official film franchise has been British or Irish. The idea of an American in the role has never been seriously entertained. That protection is not just cultural sentiment. It is backed by an industry with a documented track record of technical excellence, craft infrastructure, and institutional investment that makes exclusion look like a decision rather than a default.
There is a difference between a Nigerian actor being overlooked because of structural bias and a Nigerian actor being overlooked because the production could not find the technical support it needed on the ground. Both things happen. Conflating them prevents the harder conversation: what does the industry need to build so that the answer to either question is impossible?
To compete globally, I believe Nollywood must focus more on producing fewer but better quality films. The craft gap is real and it is internal. Sound design, production quality, consistency of post-production, dialect work, the technical infrastructure that allows a production to be competitive at international standard: these are not things that can be outsourced to the west's goodwill. They have to be built here.
Consider two actors of comparable talent operating in the same global industry. One builds a career within a system that has the financing, the distribution, and the institutional weight to place him in rooms where the biggest decisions get made. The other operates within an industry that is still building that infrastructure. Their ability in the room is the same. What the room does with them is not.
Idris Elba learned a Zulu dialect to play Nelson Mandela. He researched the accent, the cadence, the specific way Mandela carried himself in speech. The production he was part of had the resources and the institutional seriousness to demand that level of craft. That is what a properly resourced industry makes possible: not just the talent, but the conditions that allow the talent to be taken seriously at full scale. When African stories get adapted abroad and the cast does not speak with authentic Nigerian dialects, when the accent is vaguely pan-African rather than specifically Yoruba or Igbo or Hausa, it is partly a failure of casting and partly a failure of infrastructure: the African dialect coaches, cultural consultants, and craft professionals who should be indispensable were not in the room to make that demand.
This is what a media apparatus actually does. It does not just produce content. It creates the conditions under which certain things cannot be done without the people who hold the cultural knowledge. Hollywood could not make a film set in 1920s Harlem without African American cultural consultants making certain decisions impossible to get wrong. The infrastructure of cultural expertise makes itself indispensable.
African media infrastructure is not yet at that point across the board. There are exceptional practitioners in every discipline. There are productions that demonstrate what is possible when the resources and the intention align. But the systemic infrastructure, the training pipelines, the financing structures, the industry standards, the regulatory frameworks that protect and promote local craft, these are still being built.
The world's attention does not stay in one place. Every cultural moment has a peak. The window in which global audiences are genuinely hungry for African stories, in which streaming platforms are actively competing to invest in African content, in which the most interesting music and fashion and design reference points are coming from the continent, that window is open now. But, it will not stay open indefinitely.
What gets built inside it will determine whether Africa captures this moment or watches it pass while the stories get told by others again, adapted by outside studios, distributed through outside platforms, and filtered through a gaze that is not African. The answer is not to wait for Hollywood to come with better intentions. Korea did not wait. Neither did Japan. They built the infrastructure that made their stories impossible to tell without them. They invested in craft, in distribution, in the institutional seriousness that turns cultural output into cultural dominance.
Africa has the stories. It has the talent. It has the audience, both locally and across a diaspora that spans the world. IShowSpeed's 28-day tour demonstrated that there is a global hunger for the real Africa, not the one shaped by decades of external narration, but the actual continent, modern, complex, energetic, and alive. That hunger exists. The question now, is who builds the infrastructure to feed it.
The story belongs to Africa. The apparatus to tell it at scale, consistently, at world standard, with the craft that makes it impossible to ignore or replace: is still being built. The urgency to build it has never been clearer.
